Singapore Housing AffordabilityThrough the Lens of Mortgage Rates - Maxthon

February 2026

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Singapore’s housing market presents a paradoxical scenario: exceptional public housing success coupled with intensifying affordability challenges. With over 80% of residents living in Housing Development Board (HDB) flats and home ownership at 88%, Singapore has achieved remarkable housing security. However, the 2025-2026 period reveals persistent tensions where declining mortgage rates have paradoxically contributed to price pressures rather than improved affordability.
This case study examines Singapore’s housing affordability crisis through the critical lens of mortgage rate dynamics, analyzing how interest rate movements interact with supply constraints, policy interventions, and demographic pressures to shape housing accessibility for different socioeconomic segments.

KEY FINDINGS:

Mortgage rates declined from ~3.1% (early 2025) to 1.4-1.8% (late 2025), yet housing affordability deteriorated
HDB resale prices increased 2.4% year-on-year (January 2026), with million-dollar flats becoming routine
Median household income of S$11,297/month struggles against 4-room HDB flats exceeding S$800,000 in mature estates
HDB’s fixed 2.6% rate now exceeds competitive bank rates (1.4-1.8%), driving refinancing momentum
Supply-demand imbalance persists: only 5,300 private units completed in 2025 vs. 7,600 projected for 2026

MARKET CONTEXT AND CURRENT STATE
1.1 Dual Housing Market Structure
Singapore operates a unique dual-track housing system characterized by dominant public housing provision alongside a vibrant private market:
Public Housing (HDB): Accommodates over 80% of resident population through subsidized Build-To-Order (BTO) flats and resale transactions. The government provides substantial grants—up to S$120,000 via the Enhanced CPF Housing Grant (EHG)—targeted at lower-income first-time buyers. Additional grants include the Proximity Housing Grant (S$20,000-30,000) and various family-oriented subsidies.
Private Housing: Comprises condominiums, executive condominiums (EC), and landed properties. Private property transactions are governed by market dynamics with cooling measures including Additional Buyer’s Stamp Duty (ABSD) and Total Debt Servicing Ratio (TDSR) restrictions.
1.2 Mortgage Rate Environment (2025-2026)
The Singapore mortgage landscape underwent significant transformation in 2025 following the full transition to the Singapore Overnight Rate Average (SORA) benchmark, replacing the legacy SIBOR and SOR systems. This transition enhanced transparency and responsiveness to market conditions.
Current Mortgage Rate Structure (February 2026):

Bank Fixed Rates: 1.30-1.80% (depending on loan quantum and tenure)
Bank Floating Rates: 3M SORA + 0.2-0.8% spread ≈ 1.14-2.14%
HDB Concessionary Rate: Fixed at 2.60% (CPF OA rate + 0.1%)
3-Month SORA: Currently ~1.34%, down from peak above 3.0% in 2023
The dramatic decline in bank mortgage rates—from approximately 3.1% in early 2025 to as low as 1.4% by year-end—has created a critical inflection point. For the first time in years, bank financing substantially undercuts HDB’s concessionary 2.6% rate, triggering widespread refinancing activity.
1.3 Housing Price Dynamics
Despite easing mortgage rates, housing prices continue upward trajectory across both public and private segments:

HDB Resale Market Performance:

HDB Resale Price Index: 209.7 (January 2026), up 1.2% month-on-month
Year-on-Year Growth: +2.4% compared to January 2025
Transaction Volume: 2,351 units (January 2026), rebounding 15.1% from December
Record Transaction: S$1.56 million for 5-room flat at The Pinnacle @ Duxton
Median 4-room Mature Estate Prices: S$800,000-1,050,000 (e.g., Bukit Merah, Toa Payoh)
BTO Launch Prices (Feb 2026): 4-room from S$338,000-541,000 depending on classification

Private Property Market:

Q4 2025 Price Growth: +0.7% quarter-on-quarter (URA Flash Estimate)
Full Year 2025: +3.4% annual growth (moderated from 2024’s +3.9%)
New Completions: Only 5,300 units in 2025, rising to 7,600 in 2026
Supply Gap: Well below 10-year average annual completion of ~10,000 units

THE MORTGAGE RATE PARADOX
2.1 Counterintuitive Impact of Rate Reductions
Economic theory suggests that lower borrowing costs should improve housing affordability by reducing monthly debt servicing obligations. However, Singapore’s experience in 2025 demonstrates a paradoxical outcome: declining mortgage rates coincided with accelerated price appreciation rather than improved affordability.

Mechanism of the Paradox:
The rate decline operated through three simultaneous channels that ultimately undermined affordability objectives:

Enhanced Purchasing Power: Lower interest rates mathematically increase the loan quantum that households can service within regulatory constraints (30% Mortgage Servicing Ratio for HDB loans; 60% Total Debt Servicing Ratio for private property). A household with S$11,000 monthly income can afford approximately S$250 more in monthly payments at 1.5% versus 2.6% rates, translating to roughly S$65,000 additional borrowing capacity over 25 years.
Demand Stimulation: Improved affordability calculations brought marginal buyers—those previously priced out—into active participation. This demand expansion occurred against relatively inelastic supply, as property development timelines span 3-5 years and cannot respond to short-term rate changes.
Price Capitalization: Sellers quickly adjusted asking prices upward, effectively capturing the benefit of reduced financing costs. The “million-dollar HDB” phenomenon—once exceptional, now routine in prime locations—reflects this capitalization dynamic.
2.2 Quantitative Analysis: Affordability Metrics
Analyzing affordability through mortgage rate requirements reveals the severity of Singapore’s challenge. Using the standard 30% income-to-mortgage threshold with median household income of S$11,297/month (2024 data), we can calculate required rate reductions:

Case Study: 4-Room HDB Flat Purchase

Property: 4-room HDB in mature estate (e.g., Bukit Merah, Toa Payoh)
Transaction Price: S$900,000 (mid-range for mature estates)
Down Payment (10%): S$90,000 (funded via CPF Ordinary Account)
Loan Amount: S$810,000
Loan Tenure: 25 years
Median Household Income: S$11,297/month
Affordable Monthly Payment (30% MSR): S$3,389

Mortgage Rate Requirements for Affordability:
At current bank rates of 1.5%, the monthly payment on S$810,000 over 25 years equals approximately S$3,240—technically within the 30% MSR threshold. However, this calculation reveals critical concerns:

The median household operates at maximum debt capacity with minimal buffer for financial shocks
Lower-income households (below median) are systematically excluded from mature estate purchases
Calculation excludes property tax, maintenance fees, and other ownership costs
Rising prices continue eroding the marginal benefit of rate reductions
For context, the same flat priced at S$600,000 (typical non-mature estate BTO after grants) requires only S$2,160/month at 1.5% rates—comfortably affordable at 19% of median income and providing substantial financial flexibility.

OUTLOOK AND PROJECTIONS (2026-2027)
3.1 Mortgage Rate Trajectory
The mortgage rate environment faces competing pressures that will shape affordability dynamics through the medium term:

Upward Pressures:

Federal Reserve Policy: Anticipated stabilization of U.S. rates in 2.5-3.0% range limits further SORA declines. Singapore banks’ funding costs remain partially indexed to global dollar liquidity.
Bank Margin Normalization: Current promotional rates (1.3-1.5% fixed; SORA+0.2% floating) represent aggressive competition. Historical spreads suggest gradual widening to 1.8-2.2% as promotional periods expire.
Inflation Persistence: Core inflation at 1.2% (Q4 2025) suggests limited room for additional monetary easing.

Downward Pressures:

Competitive Banking Environment: 16 banks competing in Singapore’s mortgage market sustain pressure on margins, particularly for high-value loans (>S$800,000).
MAS Policy Neutrality: Monetary Authority of Singapore maintained policy settings unchanged (January 2026), supporting stable rate environment.
Economic Growth Moderation: GDP forecasts suggest continued but moderating expansion, limiting inflationary pressures.

Base Case Projection:
Mortgage rates likely stabilize in 1.8-2.3% range through 2026-2027, representing mild upward drift from current promotional levels but remaining historically low. SORA expected to range 1.0-1.5%, with bank spreads normalizing to 0.5-0.8%.
3.2 Housing Price Outlook
Property consultancies project continued but moderated price growth for 2026, reflecting the complex interplay of supply expansion, cooling measures, and persistent demand:

HDB Resale Market (2026):

Price Growth: 0-2% annual increase (substantial moderation from recent years)
Supply Injection: 13,840 flats reaching Minimum Occupation Period (MOP)—double 2025 levels
BTO Competition: 19,600 new BTO flats launching across three exercises reduces resale premium
Regional Variation: Mature estates may see continued strength; non-mature estates face price pressure

Private Property Market (2026):

Price Growth: 2-4% projected by major consultancies (moderate continued appreciation)
Supply Recovery: 7,600 completions in 2026 vs. 5,300 in 2025, but still below historical average
Government Land Sales: Largest program since 2017, yielding 11,000 potential homes (2025-2027)
Continued Strength: Limited supply pipeline and high construction costs support price floors
3.3 Affordability Trajectory
The outlook for housing affordability presents a nuanced picture with differential impacts across market segments and income cohorts:

Improving Indicators:

BTO Supply Surge: 55,000 units launching 2025-2027 provides unprecedented first-time buyer access
Grant Enhancements: EHG up to S$120,000 maintains real affordability for targeted lower-income cohorts
Bank Rate Competitiveness: Refinancing from HDB 2.6% to bank 1.5% saves ~S$340/month on S$500,000 loan
MOP Supply Wave: 13,840 resale units provide immediate-occupancy alternatives to 3-4 year BTO waits

Persistent Challenges:

Price-Income Divergence: Housing prices growing faster than median incomes (3.9% household income growth 2023-2024 vs. price increases)
Million-Dollar Normalization: Premium locations permanently unaffordable for median households
Private Market Exclusivity: S$1-1.5 million entry points require dual high incomes (>S$15,000 combined)
Generational Inequity: Younger cohorts face structurally higher price-to-income ratios than parents
Marginal Buyer Pressure: Rate normalization to 2%+ may re-exclude recent marginal entrants

SOLUTIONS AND POLICY RESPONSES
4.1 Current Government Interventions
Singapore’s multi-pronged approach to housing affordability combines supply expansion, targeted subsidies, and demand management:

Supply-Side Measures:

Aggressive BTO Ramp-Up: 55,000 units (2025-2027) represents 67% increase over previous three-year period
Accelerated Development: 20% of 2026 supply designated “Shorter Waiting Time” (<3 years completion)
Location Diversification: Greater Southern Waterfront and other prime-location BTOs expand access
Classification Framework: Standard/Plus/Prime system provides tiered pricing with differential subsidies

Subsidy Enhancement:

Enhanced CPF Housing Grant (EHG): Up to S$120,000 for households earning <S$9,000/month
Proximity Housing Grant: S$20,000-30,000 for multigenerational proximity (expanded to singles 35+)
Singles Access: October 2024 reforms allow singles to purchase 2-room Flexi flats in all locations
Fresh Start Housing: Extended to public rental families with children (February 2026)

Cooling Measures (Ongoing):

Additional Buyer’s Stamp Duty (ABSD): Up to 60% for foreign buyers; 30% for second properties
Loan-to-Value Limits: 75% maximum for private property (80% for HDB)
Total Debt Servicing Ratio: 60% cap on total debt obligations
Seller’s Stamp Duty: Progressive rates discourage speculative flipping
4.2 Recommended Policy Enhancements
While current policies demonstrate comprehensive approach, additional measures could further improve affordability outcomes:

Short-Term Interventions (0-2 years):

Income Ceiling Revision
Rationale: Current S$14,000/month threshold (established years ago) excludes middle-income families facing genuine affordability constraints. Inflation-adjusted ceiling of S$16,000-18,000 would restore original intent.
Implementation: Phased increase with maintained grant progressivity to preserve lower-income targeting.
CPF Usage Flexibility
Rationale: Allow higher CPF drawdown for first-time buyers to reduce cash down payment burden, particularly for younger households with limited savings but strong earning trajectories.
Implementation: Increase Ordinary Account utilization to 100% of down payment (currently capped) with safeguards ensuring adequate retirement savings.
Rate Lock Programs
Rationale: Volatility in floating rates creates planning uncertainty. Government-backed rate lock options would provide stability for first-time HDB buyers.
Implementation: HDB offers fixed-rate lock guarantee at competitive rates (e.g., 2.0%) for first 5 years, funded through CPF Board mechanisms.

Medium-Term Structural Reforms (2-5 years):

Graduated Pricing Framework
Rationale: Current Standard/Plus/Prime classification creates sharp discontinuities. More granular pricing based on objective location metrics would improve allocative efficiency.
Implementation: Algorithmic pricing model incorporating MRT proximity, school rankings, amenity density, generating continuous subsidy gradient rather than three-tier system.
Rental-Purchase Pathway
Rationale: High up-front costs (10% down payment + stamp duty + legal fees ≈ S$100,000 for S$900,000 flat) delay homeownership for young households despite adequate income.
Implementation: Government-backed lease-to-own program allowing initial rental occupation with automatic purchase option after 3-5 years, with rent credits applied to down payment.
Employer Co-Investment Schemes
Rationale: Singaporean employers currently contribute 17% to CPF but have no direct housing incentive role. Structured programs could leverage corporate balance sheets.
Implementation: Tax incentives for employers offering housing down payment assistance or co-guarantor arrangements for employees, similar to education loan frameworks.

Long-Term Systemic Solutions (5+ years):

Land Intensification Strategy
Rationale: Fundamental supply constraint stems from limited land (728 km²). Technological and urban planning advances enable higher-density development without quality compromise.
Implementation: Strategic rezoning of industrial/commercial areas for mixed-use residential; aggressive development of underground infrastructure freeing surface land; exploration of reclamation projects in Greater Southern Waterfront expansion.
Tenure Innovation
Rationale: 99-year leasehold model concentrates ownership costs in early decades while building long-term lease decay risk. Alternative tenure structures could improve intergenerational equity.
Implementation: Pilot programs for 60-year “affordable lease” HDBs with reduced initial cost but proportional resale value, targeted at genuinely affordable segments. Concurrently, expand 999-year/freehold options for premium tiers willing to pay full market value.
Regional Decentralization
Rationale: Excessive concentration in mature estates (Bukit Merah, Toa Payoh, Queenstown) drives price premiums. Deliberate economic activity dispersion could rebalance demand.
Implementation: Strategic relocation of government agencies and commercial headquarters to non-mature towns (Punggol, Tengah); enhanced MRT connectivity; aggressive amenity development creating genuine alternatives to central locations.
IMPACT ANALYSIS
5.1 Socioeconomic Segmentation
Housing affordability challenges manifest differently across Singapore’s income distribution, requiring segmented analysis:

Segment 1: Lower-Income Households (Bottom 20%)
Income Range: Monthly household income <S$2,434
Impact Analysis: This cohort remains heavily dependent on government subsidies for housing access. The Enhanced CPF Housing Grant of up to S$120,000 is transformative, making 2-3 room BTO flats in non-mature estates financially viable. However, resale market participation is effectively impossible even with maximum grants. Mortgage rates have minimal impact as these households are grant-constrained rather than financing-constrained.
Outlook: Stable access through subsidized BTO pipeline; vulnerable to grant policy changes; intergenerational mobility limited by inability to accumulate housing equity in appreciating locations.

Segment 2: Middle-Income Households (20th-60th Percentile)
Income Range: Monthly household income S$2,434-11,297
Impact Analysis: This segment experiences the most acute affordability tension. Median households (S$11,297/month) can technically afford 4-room BTOs but face severe competition (application rates exceeding 10:1 in desirable locations) and extended 3-4 year waits. Resale market access to mature estates is marginal—requiring maximum debt utilization with minimal buffers. The decline in mortgage rates from 2.6% to 1.5% provided approximately S$300/month relief on typical S$600,000 loans, but concurrent price appreciation largely offset this benefit.
Outlook: Bifurcated outcomes: successful BTO applicants achieve homeownership with moderate financial stress; unsuccessful applicants face extended housing insecurity and rental costs exceeding potential mortgage payments.

Segment 3: Upper-Middle Income Households (60th-80th Percentile)
Income Range: Monthly household income S$11,297-22,000
Impact Analysis: This cohort navigates the transition zone between HDB and private property. Many exceed S$14,000 income ceiling for HDB but find private entry points (S$1.2-1.5 million condos) challenging. Mortgage rate dynamics have more pronounced impact: rate reduction from 3% to 1.5% on S$1 million loan saves approximately S$800/month, materially improving private property accessibility. However, this group faces “missing middle” policy gap—too high income for HDB support, too low wealth for comfortable private ownership.
Outlook: Improving prospects if rates stabilize below 2%; vulnerable to upward rate drift; benefit from Executive Condominium options bridging HDB-private divide.

Segment 4: High-Income Households (Top 20%)
Income Range: Monthly household income >S$22,000 (top 10%: >S$34,489)
Impact Analysis: Minimal affordability constraints; mortgage rate movements primarily affect investment decisions rather than accessibility. This cohort actively benefits from lower rates through portfolio optimization—refinancing existing mortgages, leveraging cheap credit for investment properties (despite ABSD penalties), and upgrading to premium segments. Rate reductions translate directly to wealth accumulation rather than housing security.
Outlook: Continued advantage; widening wealth gap as asset appreciation outpaces wage growth.

5.2 Generational Impacts
Housing affordability dynamics create significant intergenerational disparities that threaten social cohesion:

Baby Boomers and Generation X (Born 1946-1980):
These cohorts entered homeownership during Singapore’s developmental phase when housing was genuinely affordable relative to incomes. Median price-to-income ratios in the 1990s-2000s ranged 3-4x versus current 7-8x for comparable properties. Beneficiaries of sustained appreciation, this group holds substantial housing wealth—often S$500,000+ in unrealized gains on properties purchased for S$200,000-300,000. However, their success creates policy dilemma: affordability improvements for younger buyers (through price moderation) directly erode existing homeowners’ net worth.

Millennials (Born 1981-1996):
This cohort faces structural disadvantage despite strong educational credentials and employment outcomes. Entry into housing market coincided with post-2008 recovery and sustained price appreciation. Many delayed marriage and homeownership due to affordability concerns, creating demographic ripple effects (lower fertility, later family formation). Those who successfully entered 2015-2020 benefited from ultra-low rates but paid premium prices. Current members aged 30-40 represent peak demand cohort competing for limited supply.

Generation Z (Born 1997-2012):
Youngest cohort entering housing market faces most acute challenges. Starting salaries have not kept pace with property appreciation, and expectation of parental financial assistance is becoming normalized necessity rather than luxury. Risk of “lost generation” unable to achieve homeownership without inter-generational wealth transfer. However, this group may benefit from forthcoming supply surge (55,000 BTOs 2025-2027) if demand moderates as Millennials complete purchases.
5.3 Macroeconomic and Social Implications
Housing affordability challenges extend beyond individual welfare to systemic economic and social consequences:

Economic Productivity:
High housing costs divert household resources from consumption and investment to debt servicing. Median household spending 30%+ of income on housing (up from 20% historically) reduces disposable income available for other sectors. Additionally, geographic immobility—unwillingness to sell properties due to capital gains concerns—creates labor market friction, limiting optimal job-worker matching.

Entrepreneurship and Innovation:
Elevated fixed housing costs increase opportunity cost of career risk-taking. Individuals bearing S$3,000-4,000 monthly mortgage obligations exhibit lower propensity for entrepreneurial ventures or career transitions. This conservatism may suppress innovation and economic dynamism critical to Singapore’s competitiveness in knowledge economy.

Demographic Sustainability:
Housing unaffordability correlates with declining fertility rates (currently 1.04, well below replacement 2.1). Young couples defer childbearing until housing security achieved, narrowing reproductive window and reducing family size. Long-term implications for workforce replenishment and social support systems are profound.

Social Stratification:
Housing wealth concentration among older, higher-income cohorts exacerbates inequality. Gini coefficient of 0.435 (before transfers) reflects increasingly bifurcated society. Younger generations perceive system as rigged, undermining meritocratic social compact that underpins Singapore’s governance model. Risk of class calcification as housing becomes intergenerational wealth transfer mechanism rather than achievement-based attainment.

Financial Stability:
High household leverage creates systemic vulnerability. Median household with S$600,000 mortgage faces substantial interest rate risk if rates normalize to 3-4%. Aggregate household debt at ~70% of GDP (one of highest globally) concentrates risk in property sector. Sharp correction could trigger balance sheet recession similar to Japan’s 1990s experience.

COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
Singapore’s housing challenges exist within global context of urban affordability crises, but exhibit distinctive characteristics:

Singapore vs. Hong Kong:
Hong Kong represents extreme affordability crisis with price-to-income ratios exceeding 18x versus Singapore’s 7-8x. However, Hong Kong lacks Singapore’s comprehensive public housing system—only ~50% live in public housing versus Singapore’s 80%+. Singapore’s HDB model provides far superior baseline housing security despite recent affordability deterioration. Key lesson: public housing dominance insulates median households from worst market extremes.

Singapore vs. Major U.S. Cities (New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco):
These markets share Singapore’s problem of constrained supply driving price appreciation. However, U.S. cities face different dynamics: zoning restrictions rather than absolute land scarcity, and complete absence of public housing provision at scale. Singapore’s integrated approach of supply management, subsidies, and regulatory controls demonstrates more sophisticated policy toolkit. U.S. cities’ market-dominant approaches have generated worse outcomes for lower-income populations despite greater land availability.

Singapore vs. European Social Housing Models (Vienna, Amsterdam):
Vienna’s municipal housing serves ~60% of population through rental tenure rather than ownership, avoiding speculative dynamics. Singapore’s emphasis on ownership creates wealth-building opportunities but also exposes households to market volatility and leverage risk. Trade-off: Singapore model generates political support through ownership stakes but European model provides greater flexibility and affordability stability.

CONCLUSION
Singapore’s housing affordability crisis represents a paradox of success. The nation has achieved unparalleled homeownership rates and housing security through sophisticated public policy, yet faces intensifying affordability pressures that threaten social equity and economic dynamism. The 2025-2026 period crystallizes this tension: mortgage rates declined dramatically from ~3.1% to 1.4-1.8%, yet housing became less—not more—affordable for typical households.
This counterintuitive outcome reveals fundamental limitations of monetary policy tools in addressing structural housing challenges. Lower rates stimulate demand in supply-constrained markets, with benefits captured by sellers and existing homeowners rather than aspiring buyers. Singapore’s experience demonstrates that sustainable affordability requires coordinated supply expansion, targeted subsidies, and demand management—not interest rate manipulation alone.
Looking forward, the government’s aggressive supply response—55,000 BTO units 2025-2027—provides cautious optimism. If sustained, this volume could stabilize price growth and improve access for first-time buyers, particularly in non-mature estates. However, three critical challenges persist:
Mature estate premiums continue expanding beyond median household reach, creating geographic stratification
Missing middle households (S$14,000-20,000/month income) lack adequate policy support, excluded from HDB but struggling with private entry costs
Intergenerational equity concerns mount as younger cohorts face structurally disadvantaged position relative to parents’ generation

Addressing these requires willingness to challenge sacred cows. The S$14,000 income ceiling needs inflation adjustment. The 99-year leasehold model deserves reconsideration. Geographic decentralization must accelerate. And perhaps most controversially, policymakers must accept that improving affordability for new buyers inevitably moderates appreciation for existing owners—a political reality that has stymied reform in jurisdictions worldwide.
Singapore stands at a crossroads. The foundations of its housing success—extensive public provision, targeted subsidies, long-term planning—remain sound. But sustained affordability requires evolution beyond the current model. The alternative is gradual erosion of the homeownership dream that has underpinned Singapore’s social compact, with profound implications for equality, opportunity, and national cohesion.

The mortgage rate lens reveals a deeper truth: housing affordability is not a cyclical problem amenable to monetary fine-tuning, but a structural challenge demanding comprehensive reform. Singapore’s response to this challenge will shape its social and economic trajectory for decades to come.

REFERENCES AND DATA SOURCES

Housing & Development Board (HDB). (2026). HDB Launches 9,012 Flats in February 2026 BTO and SBF Exercises.
Singapore Department of Statistics. (2025). Key Household Income Trends, 2024. Press Release, February 13, 2025.
Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA). (2026). Private Residential Property Price Index Q4 2025 Flash Estimate.
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). (2026). Monetary Policy Statement, January 29, 2026.
PropertyGuru Singapore. (2026). Singapore Mortgage Rate 2026: What Buyers And Homeowners Should Know.
99.co Singapore. (2026). HDB Resale Prices & Transaction Data.
MoneySmart Singapore. (2026). Best Mortgage Home Loan Rates in Singapore 2026.
Redbrick Mortgage Advisory. (2025). Best Home Loan Singapore Guide.
StackedHomes. (2025). How The HDB Resale Market Performed In 2025, And What It Means For 2026 Prices.
Ministry of Manpower (MOM). (2026). Labour Market Statistics – Summary Table: Income.
AIAIG Investment News. (2026). Singapore Mortgage Rate Downturn: How SORA Reshapes Property Investment.
Homejourney Singapore. (2026). Singapore Interest Rate Trends 2026: Mortgage Planning Guide.
DollarBack Mortgage. (2026). Best Home Loan Rates Singapore 2026.
MortgageWise Singapore. (2026). TOP10 Home Loan Rates SG 2026.
Maxthon Privacy Browser. (2026). Singapore Housing Affordability Case Study.