I’ve read through the article about SUTD experts working with AI to power design innovation. Let me summarise the key points:

https://www.straitstimes.com/life/sutd-experts-work-with-ai-to-power-design-innovation

The article discusses how the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) is integrating AI into design education and research, particularly in architecture and sustainable design. It highlights five groundbreaking AI projects:

1. FORMAS.AI: Created by Associate Professor Carlos Banon, this software converts sketches into architectural renders and 3d-printable models. It enables students and professionals to maintain creative control while utilising AI to enhance their designs.
2. Design Brain: Assistant Professor Immanuel Koh’s project aims to develop AI models that can understand architectural design reasoning. The goal is to create AI that can communicate with humans about design decisions.
3. Ear Canal Analysis: Associate Professor Stylianos Dritsas collaborated with Changi General Hospital to utilise machine learning to enhance hearing aid production. Their system can work with incomplete data and even spot errors in ear canal impressions.
4. Climate Adaptation Visualisation: Professor Eva Castro uses AI to generate visualisations of coastal protection scenarios. This helps communicate complex design concepts to stakeholders across borders.
5. Extended Reality (XR) and AI: Phd candidate Daryl Ho is investigating how XR can enhance human-AI interaction, enabling AI to serve as a creative partner in designing virtual environments.

The article emphasises SUTD’s balanced approach – embracing AI technology while also addressing ethical considerations. Professor Khoo Peng Beng, who joined SUTD in 2025, notes that AI is “agnostic to either good or evil applications” and stresses the importance of keeping “human and AI goals aligned.”

SUTD’s Balanced Approach to AI Integration: An In-Depth Analysis

SUTD’s approach to AI integration in design education and research represents a thoughtful balance between technological innovation and ethical considerations. This approach is particularly evident in the university’s curriculum and research initiatives.

Dual Focus on Technology and Ethics

At the core of SUTD’s philosophy is the recognition that AI development must be accompanied by parallel ethical considerations. Professor Khoo Peng Beng articulates this clearly when he states that AI has “light and dark sides” that need to be “rigorously addressed through the university’s curriculum.” This acknowledgement shows SUTD’s commitment to not just developing AI systems but also critically examining their implications.

The university’s “Design AI” research specifically focuses on the philosophy and ethics of AI, demonstrating that ethical considerations aren’t merely an afterthought but a central pillar of their approach. This intentional pairing of technical development with ethical inquiry creates a framework where innovation is guided by human values.

Human-AI Partnership Model

SUTD’s approach appears to be built on the premise that AI and human intelligence should function as partners rather than competitors. This partnership model is evident in several projects:

• In FORMAS.AI, Professor Banon emphasises that AI should “amplify and sharpen” the designer’s intuition, “not overshadow or replace it.”
• Daryl Ho’s research explicitly frames AI as a “reliable assistant” and promotes “collaborative intelligence rather than artificial intelligence.”
• Professor Dritsas’s ear canal project illustrates how AI can augment human expertise by identifying patterns that may be overlooked by human practitioners.

This philosophical stance positions AI as an enhancement to, rather than a replacement for, human creativity, which addresses one of the most significant ethical concerns about AI adoption.

Speculative Design as Ethical Practice

SUTD uses speculative design as a method for ethical inquiry. Professor Khoo describes how students “conduct research about the design of greener cities, the future of work and the future of healthcare,” creating “provocative scenarios that spark engagement and stimulate debate.” This approach allows students to explore potential futures and critically assess the implications of emerging technologies before they become a reality.

By engaging with both “light and dark sides” of AI, SUTD encourages students to develop a nuanced understanding of technology’s potential impacts. This practice of anticipatory ethics—considering ethical implications before technologies are fully developed—represents a proactive rather than reactive approach to technological governance.

Maintaining Human Agency and Vision

Across multiple projects, SUTD researchers emphasise the importance of preserving human control and vision. Carlos Banon’s FORMAS.AI was explicitly designed to address the issue of designers losing control over their vision when using AI. The application ensures that designers “transition from being led by the AI’s creations to actively guiding its development.”

This focus on maintaining human agency demonstrates SUTD’s commitment to ensuring that AI serves human creativity rather than directing or limiting it. It’s an ethical stance that recognises the value of human intuition, experience, and intention in the design process.

Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration

SUTD’s projects frequently involve collaboration between different disciplines and with external partners. The ear canal project with Changi General Hospital, the Centre for Climate Adaptation’s work with international partners, and Immanuel Koh’s “transdisciplinary” approach all demonstrate how SUTD views AI development as inherently collaborative.

This collaborative approach has ethical implications as it ensures multiple perspectives are considered in AI development, reducing the risk of narrow viewpoints leading to harmful applications. It also recognises that addressing complex societal challenges requires diverse expertise beyond technical knowledge alone.

Responsible Application to Societal Challenges

SUTD directs its AI research toward addressing pressing societal challenges, such as climate change adaptation, healthcare accessibility, and urban planning. This focus demonstrates an ethical commitment to using technology for social good rather than purely commercial or academic interests.

Professor Eva Castro’s work on coastal protection using AI visualizations exemplifies this approach, as does Professor Dritsas’s collaboration on improving hearing aid production. By applying AI to such challenges, SUTD aligns technological development with humanitarian goals.

Conclusion

SUTD’s balanced approach to AI integration reflects a sophisticated understanding of both the potential and pitfalls of emerging technologies. By embedding ethical inquiry into technical education, maintaining human agency in human-AI collaboration, using speculative design to anticipate challenges, fostering cross-disciplinary collaboration, and focusing on societal impact, SUTD offers a model for responsible AI innovation.

This approach recognizes that true innovation isn’t just about technical capability but about thoughtful application guided by human values and social benefit. As Professor Khoo states, the overarching importance is “to keep human and AI goals aligned”—a principle that seems to guide all aspects of SUTD’s engagement with artificial intelligence.

The Question of Waning Human Agency in AI Development

The article raises important questions about human agency in the age of AI, with evidence pointing in both directions.

Signs of Preserving Human Agency

SUTD’s approach explicitly emphasizes maintaining human control. Professor Banon’s FORMAS.AI was specifically created to address designers’ struggles “to maintain control of and execute their vision using AI.” The software aims to help users “transition from being led by the AI’s creations to actively guiding its development.”

Similarly, PhD candidate Daryl Ho frames AI as a “reliable assistant to designers” rather than a replacement, promoting “collaborative intelligence” models where humans remain the primary creative force.

Signs of Potential Agency Reduction

Despite these intentions, there are subtle indications that human agency might be shifting:

1. Dependency on AI tools: As students become accustomed to using AI from their first year, they may develop reliance on these tools for creative processes. Prof Banon mentions students develop “a new kind of intuition” – while framed positively, this suggests human thinking is adapting to accommodate AI capabilities.
2. Delegation of evaluation: Prof Dritsas’s ear canal project reveals that the machine learning model could “spot errors” in the team’s work and make “hyper-intelligent assessments” with “more than 90 per cent accuracy.” This shifts some evaluative authority from humans to AI systems.
3. AI reasoning remains opaque: Prof Koh’s work on “Design Brain” acknowledges the challenge of understanding why and how AI makes specific design decisions. This opacity complicates the question of agency – can humans maintain full agency when working with systems whose decision-making they don’t fully comprehend?

The Emerging Balance

What seems to be emerging at SUTD is not a binary question of agency versus no agency, but rather a reconfiguration of the human-machine relationship. The goal appears to be what Prof Koh describes as “un-automating” or “expanding” design thinking through human-AI collaboration.

This suggests human agency isn’t simply waning but transforming. As AI handles certain aspects of the creative process, human attention may shift to higher-level considerations about intention, meaning, and context – areas where human experience currently gives us an advantage.

Prof Khoo’s emphasis that “AI itself is agnostic to either good or evil applications, and is dependent on the intention of the human user” places ethical agency firmly with humans, even as technical agency becomes more distributed.

The open question is whether this balance can be maintained as AI capabilities continue to advance, and whether educational institutions like SUTD can successfully develop frameworks that preserve meaningful human agency in increasingly automated design processes.

AI and Human Biology: An Evolving Relationship

The article doesn’t directly address whether AI is becoming part of human biology. Still, it does hint at ways human cognition and creative processes are beginning to intertwine with AI systems.

Evidence of Integration in the Article

There are subtle indicators of an evolving human-AI relationship that suggest integration, though not biological:

1. Cognitive adaptation: Professor Banon notes that students develop a new kind of intuition, connecting fundamental, abstract shapes and simple operations to complex spatial structures. This suggests human thinking patterns are adapting to work with AI systems.
2. Extended cognition: When Professor Koh discusses his “neurocognitive design” research, he references understanding the human brain through brainwave signals emitted when an architect is reasoning or creating designs. This research examines the interface between biological cognition and artificial systems.
3. Sensory augmentation: Daryl Ho’s work explores how extended reality (XR) can “augment the way humans interact with AI beyond the standard user interface,” suggesting a more integrated sensory relationship.

The Broader Context

While not explicitly mentioned in the article, this discussion relates to the broader concept of humans as “natural-born cyborgs” (a term borrowed from philosopher Andy Clark). We increasingly use technological extensions to augment our biological capabilities:

• Smartphones function as external memory and processing systems
• Search engines extend our knowledge retrieval capabilities
• Design software enhances our visualisation abilities

AI represents the next frontier in this progression, moving from tools we actively manipulate to systems that anticipate needs and collaborate in our cognitive processes.

Biological Integration vs. Cognitive Extension

It’s important to distinguish between:

1. True biological integration, where AI is physically incorporated into human biology (through neural implants, for example) – which isn’t evident in the article
2. Cognitive extension, where AI systems function as external but increasingly integrated components of our thinking processes – which seems to be SUTD’s focus

The relationship described at SUTD appears to be primarily a cognitive extension rather than a biological integration. However, the boundaries between human cognition and AI processing are becoming more fluid, as evidenced by how students learn to think differently when collaborating with AI systems.

Looking Forward

While the article doesn’t suggest immediate biological integration with AI, it does show how educational institutions are preparing students for a world where human thinking and artificial intelligence are increasingly complementary systems. As PhD candidate Daryl Ho suggests, we may be moving toward models of “collaborative intelligence” where the boundaries between human and artificial cognition become less defined.

The true extent of AI’s integration with human biology remains an open question that extends beyond current educational practices into realms of neurotechnology and human augmentation that the article doesn’t address.

AI Practice in Singapore: Scale and Significance

The article offers some insights into Singapore’s AI landscape, although it doesn’t provide comprehensive data on the overall size of AI practices in the country.

SUTD’s AI Focus

The article highlights SUTD as a pioneer, noting that it was “one of the first institutes of higher learning to embed forms of AI, such as machine learning, in its curriculum” when it opened in 2009. This suggests Singapore has been cultivating AI expertise for at least 15 years.

SUTD’s commitment is substantial:

• It has a dedicated “Design AI” research program
• About 20 SUTD lecturers are ranked among Stanford University’s “World’s Top 2%” scientists list
• It offers what Prof. Koh describes as “the world’s first dedicated ‘AI x Architecture’ module,” established in 2019

Industry Adoption

While the article doesn’t provide economy-wide statistics, it references a McKinsey report indicating organisations globally “are already beginning to create the structures and processes that can unlock meaningful value from generative AI.”

In Singapore specifically, employment outcomes suggest strong industry demand:

• Nine out of 10 SUTD graduates found jobs within six months
• Graduates of information and digital technologies courses commanded the highest monthly pay at $5,600 in February 2025
• Many SUTD graduates secure jobs in the information and communications, financial and insurance, and scientific research sectors – all industries that are heavily investing in AI.

Government Support

The article mentions collaborations with government agencies like:

• AI Singapore (a national AI program)
• The Urban Redevelopment Authority
• PUB (national water agency)

This indicates governmental support for AI development, though the article doesn’t detail the full extent of Singapore’s national AI initiatives.

Research Infrastructure

Several research centers are mentioned:

• Centre for Climate Adaptation (CCA)
• Artificial-Architecture (interdisciplinary research laboratory)
• formAxioms @ SUTD
• AirLab@SUTD

These specialized research units suggest substantial institutional investment in AI research infrastructure.

Context Beyond the Article

The article doesn’t provide comprehensive information about Singapore’s overall AI landscape. For a complete picture, we’d need additional data about:

• Total AI-focused companies and startups
• Investment figures in AI across public and private sectors
• Number of AI professionals employed across the economy
• Scale of national AI initiatives beyond those mentioned
• AI adoption rates across different industries

What’s clear is that Singapore has positioned itself as forward-thinking in AI education and application, with SUTD serving as one example of the country’s commitment to developing AI expertise and integrating it into various fields, particularly design and architecture.

Assessing Singapore’s Position in Global AI Leadership

The article provides some insights into Singapore’s AI initiatives but doesn’t offer enough evidence to conclusively determine if Singapore is leading global AI use. Here’s what we can infer:

Strengths Indicated in the Article

1. Early Educational Integration: SUTD embedded AI in its curriculum from its founding in 2009, suggesting Singapore recognized AI’s importance relatively early.
2. Academic Excellence: The article notes about 20 SUTD lecturers rank among Stanford University’s “World’s Top 2%” scientists list, indicating high-quality AI research expertise.
3. Innovative Applications: The five featured projects demonstrate sophisticated AI applications in architecture, healthcare, and climate adaptation, showing practical implementation beyond theory.
4. Cross-sector Collaboration: The partnerships between academia (SUTD), healthcare (Changi General Hospital), and government agencies (Urban Redevelopment Authority, PUB, AI Singapore) suggest a coordinated ecosystem approach.
5. Forward-looking Implementation: Projects like the Long Island coastal protection initiative show Singapore planning AI integration into major infrastructure projects extending to 2030 and beyond.

Limitations for Assessment

The article doesn’t provide comparative data to establish Singapore’s global position:

1. No International Benchmarking: There’s no comparison to AI developments in other technology hubs like the US, China, Israel, or European centers.
2. Limited Scope: The article focuses primarily on SUTD and architectural/design applications rather than Singapore’s broader AI landscape.
3. Missing Metrics: Key indicators like total AI investments, number of AI startups, patents filed, or adoption rates across industries aren’t mentioned.
4. Single Institution Focus: While SUTD’s work is impressive, it represents just one institution in Singapore’s educational landscape.

Contextual Considerations

Without additional data, we can observe that Singapore shows strengths in:

• Educational AI Integration: Creating a pipeline of AI-capable graduates
• Applied AI Research: Focusing on practical applications rather than just theoretical research
• Long-term Planning: Incorporating AI into future infrastructure and climate adaptation

However, global AI leadership typically also considers factors like:

• Scale of AI industry and startup ecosystem
• Development of novel AI technologies and foundational models
• AI policy and regulatory innovation
• Total research output and citations
• Commercial deployment across multiple sectors

Conclusion

The article suggests Singapore has significant strengths in AI education and applied research at SUTD, with thoughtful integration into fields like architecture and design. However, to determine if Singapore is truly “leading” global AI use would require additional comparative data across multiple dimensions and sectors beyond what’s presented in this single article.

What’s clear is that Singapore, through institutions like SUTD, is making deliberate investments in AI education and application with a balanced approach that considers both technological advancement and ethical implications.

Maxthon

In an age where the digital world is in constant flux and our interactions online are ever-evolving, the importance of prioritising individuals as they navigate the expansive internet cannot be overstated. The myriad of elements that shape our online experiences calls for a thoughtful approach to selecting web browsers—one that places a premium on security and user privacy. Amidst the multitude of browsers vying for users’ loyalty, Maxthon emerges as a standout choice, providing a trustworthy solution to these pressing concerns, all without any cost to the user.

Maxthon, with its advanced features, boasts a comprehensive suite of built-in tools designed to enhance your online privacy. Among these tools are a highly effective ad blocker and a range of anti-tracking mechanisms, each meticulously crafted to fortify your digital sanctuary. This browser has carved out a niche for itself, particularly with its seamless compatibility with Windows 11, further solidifying its reputation in an increasingly competitive market.

In a crowded landscape of web browsers, Maxthon has carved out a distinct identity through its unwavering commitment to providing a secure and private browsing experience. Fully aware of the myriad threats lurking in the vast expanse of cyberspace, Maxthon works tirelessly to safeguard your personal information. Utilizing state-of-the-art encryption technology, it ensures that your sensitive data remains protected and confidential throughout your online adventures.

What truly sets Maxthon apart is its commitment to enhancing user privacy during every moment spent online. Each feature of this browser has been meticulously designed with the user’s privacy in mind. Its powerful ad-blocking capabilities work diligently to eliminate unwanted advertisements, while its comprehensive anti-tracking measures effectively reduce the presence of invasive scripts that could disrupt your browsing enjoyment. As a result, users can traverse the web with newfound confidence and safety.

Moreover, Maxthon’s incognito mode provides an extra layer of security, granting users enhanced anonymity while engaging in their online pursuits. This specialized mode not only conceals your browsing habits but also ensures that your digital footprint remains minimal, allowing for an unobtrusive and liberating internet experience. With Maxthon as your ally in the digital realm, you can explore the vastness of the internet with peace of mind, knowing that your privacy is being prioritized every step of the way.