Analysis of AI in Publishing: Implications for Singapore Schools and Publishing Houses

Key Issues in AI and Publishing

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/publishing-grapples-with-where-to-draw-the-line-on-ai

1. Authorship and Creative Integrity

The article highlights the tension between AI as a tool versus a replacement for human writers. There’s significant concern about AI potentially replacing human authorship, particularly for certain types of content. The industry distinguishes between acceptable AI assistance (research, brainstorming) and full AI authorship, which “serious publishers and agents take a hard line against.”

2. Copyright and Intellectual Property

A significant concern is the unauthorised training of AI models on copyrighted works. This issue has united authors against the practice, with Mary Rasenberger of The Authors Guild noting an unprecedented level of agreement among members. Publishers and agents are now including clauses in contracts to control or monetise AI training on authors’ works.

3. Quality and Authenticity

Despite AI advancements, many professionals maintain that AI-generated content lacks the distinctive voice, nuance, and originality of human writing. Parmy Olson describes AI prose as “bland” and believes writing in one’s own voice remains irreplaceable.

4. Economic Impact

The article suggests tiered vulnerability to AI disruption:

Lower to mid-tier ghostwriters ($25,000-$50,000 range) are most at risk
Technical and formulaic content is more easily automated
Premium creative content and high-end ghostwriting (up to $500,000) remain more protected

5. Evolving Industry Practices

Publishers like Wiley are developing guidelines for responsible AI use, recognising that prohibition isn’t realistic. AI use is becoming prevalent in publishing operations, from proposal evaluation to audiobook production and quality control.

Implications for Singapore Schools

1. Educational Content Development

Singapore’s education system, known for its rigorous curriculum and high-quality materials, could leverage AI to:

Create more adaptive and personalised learning resources
Generate supplementary educational content like practice questions and case studies
Develop concise versions of textbooks for different learning needs

2. Academic Integrity Challenges

Schools will need to:

Develop clear policies about AI use in student assignments
Implement detection tools similar to Springer Nature’s approach for academic submissions
Teach students to critically evaluate AI-generated content

3. Digital Literacy Curriculum

Singapore schools should consider:

Including AI literacy in their curriculum to prepare students for an AI-integrated workforce
Teaching students the ethical use of AI tools in writing and research
Developing guidelines similar to Wiley’s for student projects

4. Teacher Development

Educators will need training to:

Understand how to effectively use AI as a teaching assistant
Detect inappropriate AI use in student work
Model appropriate use of technology in research and writing

Implications for Singapore Publishing Houses

1. Business Model Innovation

Singapore publishers could:

Develop hybrid human-AI content creation workflows
Create new publishing formats that leverage AI capabilities
Explore AI avatars (like Marshall Goldsmith’s) for local authors to extend their reach

2. Legal Framework Adaptation

Singapore publishers should:

Review contract templates to address AI training rights
Consider compensation models for authors whose work may be used in AI training
Align with international best practices while considering Singapore’s specific IP laws

3. Multilingual Publishing Opportunities

Given Singapore’s multilingual environment, AI could:

Facilitate faster translations between Singapore’s official languages
Help create culturally appropriate content across Singapore’s diverse communities
Support the preservation and promotion of Singlish and other local linguistic features

4. Competitive Position

Singapore publishers might:

Focus on high-quality, uniquely Singaporean content that AI cannot easily replicate
Leverage AI for operational efficiency while maintaining human creative direction
Position themselves as thought leaders in responsible AI use in Southeast Asian publishing

The rapidly evolving AI landscape means that Singapore’s educational institutions and publishers will need to continuously reassess their approaches, striking a balance between innovation and the protection of human creativity and intellectual property rights.

Implications of AI for Publishing Jobs in Singapore

The integration of AI into publishing creates significant workforce impacts across the industry. Here’s an analysis of how publishing jobs in Singapore may evolve:

Editorial Roles

Acquisitions Editors

Shifting Focus: Less time evaluating manuscript basics, more on identifying unique market opportunities and distinctive voices
New Skills: Acquisitions editors will likely need to develop expertise in distinguishing AI-assisted work from fully human writing
AI Tools: May use AI for initial screening of proposals (similar to James Levine’s use of “specialist AI personas” mentioned in the article)

Copy Editors & Proofreaders

Job Vulnerability: These roles face significant disruption as AI tools become increasingly proficient at technical editing tasks
Role Evolution: May shift toward AI supervision and quality control rather than direct editing
Value-Add: We will need to emphasise uniquely human skills, such as cultural sensitivity and understanding of Singaporean contexts, that AI might miss.

Content Creation

Ghostwriters & Content Producers

Tiered Impact: As Kevin Anderson notes in the article, lower to mid-range ghostwriting ($25,000-$50,000) is most vulnerable
Specialisation: Technical and formulaic content creators face a higher replacement risk than those specialising in creative or culturally nuanced content
Hybrid Roles: Emergence of “AI handlers” who interview subjects but use AI to generate initial drafts

Specialized Writers

Resilience Factors: Writers with distinctive voices, subject matter expertise, or cultural insights specific to Singapore will remain valuable
New Opportunities: Development of “AI prompting” as a specialised skill for guiding AI to produce culturally relevant Singaporean content
Adaptation Need: Writers may need to move up-market toward premium content that requires a human touch

Production & Distribution

Layout & Design Professionals

Tool Evolution: AI-powered design tools will automate basic layout work
Value Shift: Focus will move to supervisory roles and uniquely creative design decisions
Integration Skills: Need to develop expertise in human-AI collaborative workflows

Audiobook Production

Significant Disruption: As the article mentions, “several publishers are now experimenting with the use of AI to record audiobooks”
Voice Acting: Specialized voice actors may still be needed for premium content, particularly for culturally specific Singaporean content
New Roles: Audio engineers may shift to AI voice customization and quality control

Business Operations

Rights Management

Increased Complexity: Need for specialists who understand AI training rights, licensing, and compensation models
New Positions: Emergence of “AI compliance officers” to ensure ethical use of content in training models
Legal Expertise: Growing demand for publishing professionals with both legal and technical knowledge

Marketing & Publicity

Automation: Basic marketing copy and social media content are increasingly AI-generated
Strategic Focus: Human marketers shifting to strategy, relationship management, and culturally nuanced campaigns
Data Analysis: Greater emphasis on using AI tools to analyse market trends and reader behaviours

Singapore-Specific Considerations

Multilingual Advantage

New Roles: Specialists who can guide AI in proper translation and localisation across Singapore’s official languages
Cultural Verification: Need for experts who can verify that AI-generated content meets cultural standards and sensitivities

Educational Publishing

Curriculum Integration: Growing demand for specialists who can connect AI-generated educational content with Singapore’s educational standards
Assessment Expertise: Professionals who can develop AI-resistant assessment models and authenticate student work

Government and Regulatory Positions

Policy Development: Need for publishing professionals who can advise on AI publishing regulation
Standard Setting: Opportunities for Singaporean publishing experts to help establish Southeast Asian standards for ethical AI use in publishing

Workforce Transition Strategies

For Publishing Houses

Implement gradual transition plans that retain institutional knowledge
Invest in retraining programs for existing staff to develop AI collaboration skills
Create clear ethical guidelines for AI use that preserve human creative roles

For Individual Professionals

Develop distinctive editorial or writing voices that AI cannot easily replicate.
Build expertise in Singapore-specific content areas where local knowledge is valuable.
Acquire technical skills to effectively collaborate with and supervise an AI tool.

The future of publishing jobs in Singapore will likely involve fewer but more specialised roles, with a premium placed on uniquely human creative capabilities, cultural understanding, and the ability to effectively guide and work alongside AI tools.

Writing That’s Difficult for AI to Replicate

AI systems face significant challenges replicating certain types of writing, despite improvements. These areas represent opportunities for human writers to maintain their distinctive value:

1. Deeply Personal Narratives

Lived Experience: Writing that draws from genuine personal experiences and emotions that AI hasn’t lived through
Authentic Vulnerability: Sharing genuine struggles, failures, and transformations
Cultural Specificity: Nuanced accounts of growing up within specific Singaporean communities or experiences

2. Original Creative Vision

Groundbreaking Fiction: Truly innovative storytelling that breaks established patterns or creates new genres
Distinctive Literary Voice: Unique writing styles like those of Haruki Murakami, Toni Morrison, or Singapore’s Alfian Sa’at
Experimental Forms: Writing that intentionally breaks rules or creates new literary structures

3. Specialised Cultural Knowledge

Singaporean Sensibilities: Writing that authentically captures the nuances of Singlish, local customs, and cultural references
Intercultural Insights: Work that genuinely bridges cultural perspectives based on lived experience
Historical Context: Writing that meaningfully interprets historical events through cultural lenses

4. Cutting-Edge Expert Analysis

Frontier Research: Presenting truly new insights in specialised fields
Interdisciplinary Connections: Making novel connections across domains that require deep expertise
Original Critical Theory: Developing new frameworks for understanding literature, society, or culture

5. Humour and Emotional Subtlety

Cultural Humour: Comedy that relies on cultural context and timing
Irony and Satire: Writing that operates on multiple levels of meaning and intent
Emotional Complexity: Work that navigates contradictory or ambiguous emotional states

6. Philosophical Depth

Original Philosophical Arguments: Truly novel philosophical positions or frameworks
Existential Exploration: Authentic wrestling with human meaning and purpose
Moral Reasoning: Nuanced ethical perspectives that consider complex real-world scenarios

7. Writing That Breaks AI Patterns

Anti-Formulaic Approaches: Writing that intentionally subverts expectations and formulaic elements
Intellectual Provocation: Work that challenges dominant assumptions in ways AI systems tend to avoid
Genuine Controversy: Perspectives that thoughtfully engage with truly divisive issues

8. Community-Embedded Writing

Local Journalism: Reporting deeply embedded in specific Singaporean communities
Regional Sensibilities: Writing that captures the distinctive character of specific Singapore neighbourhoods
Advocacy From Within: Writing that authentically represents community concerns from lived experience

The most AI-resistant writing often combines several of these elements, creating work that is simultaneously technically skilled, culturally specific, emotionally authentic, and intellectually original. This represents the continuing advantage of human writers in an increasingly AI-influenced publishing landscape.

Books That Would Be Difficult for AI to Replicate

Current AI systems would struggle to authentically create books with these characteristics:

Culturally Specific Literary Masterpieces

“The God of Small Things” by Arundhati Roy
The intricate portrayal of Kerala’s social politics, caste dynamics, and the deeply personal narrative of forbidden love told through a non-linear structure with a distinctive linguistic style would be nearly impossible for AI to authentically recreate.
“If We Dream Too Long” by Goh Poh Seng

This pioneering Singaporean novel captures the existential struggles of post-independence Singapore through a deeply authentic local perspective that requires lived experience of that specific historical context.

Experimental Literature

“House of Leaves” by Mark Z. Danielewski
This experimental novel employs unconventional typography, multiple unreliable narrators, nested footnotes, and innovative physical page layout as integral elements of its storytelling. AI would struggle with this level of structural innovation and intentional disorientation.
“Pale Fire” by Vladimir Nabokov
Structured as a 999-line poem with an increasingly unhinged commentary, this novel’s complex interplay between fiction and criticism requires a mastery of literary allusion and unreliable narration that AI cannot effectively reproduce.

Philosophically Complex Works

“Infinite Jest” by David Foster Wallace
Wallace’s encyclopedic novel about addiction, entertainment, and human connection features hundreds of endnotes, multiple storylines, and linguistic innovations that would be extraordinarily difficult for AI to replicate with the same intellectual depth.

“The Brothers Karamazov” by Fyodor Dostoevsky
This novel’s profound moral and philosophical examination of faith, doubt, and human nature emerges from Dostoevsky’s own spiritual struggles and understanding of Russian Orthodox theology in ways AI cannot authentically reproduce.

Cultural Commentary Through Humor

“Catch-22” by Joseph Heller
The circular logic, darkly absurdist humor, and profound anti-war message rely on a very human understanding of bureaucratic absurdity and the existential horror of war that AI systems lack.

“The Sellout” by Paul Beatty
This satirical novel about race in America uses provocative humor and taboo subjects to explore racial identity. The nuanced social commentary requires lived understanding of racial dynamics that AI cannot authentically generate.

Highly Personal Memoirs

“The Year of Magical Thinking” by Joan Didion

Didion’s exploration of grief following her husband’s death contains emotional authenticity and psychological complexity that emerges from lived personal tragedy.

“The Diving Bell and the Butterfly” by Jean-Dominique Bauby
Written by blinking one eyelid after suffering locked-in syndrome, this memoir’s perspective on human resilience emerges from an extreme personal experience that AI cannot genuinely simulate.

Culturally Hybrid Literature

“The Sympathizer” by Viet Thanh Nguyen
This spy novel/literary work explores the Vietnamese diaspora experience through a culturally divided protagonist. The authentic rendering of cultural duality requires lived experience of cultural displacement.

“A Fine Balance” by Rohinton Mistry
This historical novel about India during The Emergency interweaves caste politics, historical trauma, and cultural tensions in ways that require deep cultural knowledge and historical context.

These books demonstrate that the most AI-resistant writing combines formal innovation, cultural specificity, philosophical depth, emotional authenticity, and original perspectives that emerge from human experience, history, and creativity.

Literary Criticism vs. Historical Analysis: The Need for Personal Input Beyond AI

Literary criticism fundamentally requires more personal input and subjective interpretation than many other analytical fields, including historical analysis, for several key reasons:

Why Literary Criticism Requires Deep Personal Input

1. Interpretive Plurality as a Feature, Not a Bug

Literary criticism actively values multiple valid interpretations of the same text. Unlike historical analysis, which ideally converges toward factual consensus, literary criticism thrives on interpretive diversity. This makes AI approaches problematic because:

Literary texts deliberately invite multiple readings through ambiguity and symbolism
Critical perspectives often intentionally challenge previous interpretations
The field values fresh, unexpected connections to contemporary contexts

2. The Living Relationship Between Reader and Text

Literary criticism acknowledges the reader’s subjective experience as essential to meaning-making:

Reader-response theory explicitly centers the reader’s emotional and intellectual engagement
The critic’s personal background shapes what themes resonate and which textual elements stand out
A critic’s lived experience provides authentic grounds for relating to characters’ emotions and motivations

3. Cultural Positionality Matters

A critic’s position within specific cultural contexts is not merely background but critical to their analysis:

Understanding cultural nuances in a text often requires personal familiarity with those contexts
Different cultural lenses reveal different aspects of a text that might remain invisible otherwise
The critic’s own cultural journey shapes their capacity to recognize coded meanings and subtle references

4. Evolution Through Dialogue

Literary criticism advances through dialectical exchange rather than linear progress:

Critics engage in conversation with each other across time and space
Personal scholarly identities form part of the ongoing critical discourse
The field progresses through subjective challenges to established readings

Historical Analysis: More Amenable to AI Approaches

While still requiring human judgment, historical analysis tends to be more compatible with AI methodologies because:

1. Evidence-Based Methodology

Historical analysis prioritises documentable facts and verifiable evidence
Sources can be systematically evaluated using established criteria
Conflicting accounts can often be resolved through additional evidence

2. Consensus-Driven Goals

Historians generally aim toward factual agreement, even if interpretations differ
Methodological standards exist for evaluating competing historical narratives
The field values establishing reliable timelines and causal relationships

3. Structured Analytical Frameworks

Historical analysis often employs standardized frameworks (economic, political, social)
Comparative historical analysis follows established methodological patterns
Source criticism follows systematic approaches to evaluation

Implications for Academic Publishing

The different nature of these disciplines suggests different approaches to AI integration:

For Literary Criticism Publishing

Emphasis on the critic’s unique perspective and voice remains essential
AI tools might assist with research, but cannot replace interpretive insight
Publication standards should continue to value original, unexpected connections

For Historical Analysis Publishing

AI can potentially help with data analysis and pattern recognition
Machine learning might assist in analysing extensive historical document collections
Publication may increasingly involve human-AI collaboration, with humans focusing on interpretation

The Future of Critical Scholarship

The enduring value of personal input in literary criticism suggests that while AI may transform many aspects of publishing, the field will continue to prize the uniquely human capacity for:

Emotional resonance with literary works
Cultural insight based on lived experience
Creative connections across disparate texts and contexts
Willingness to challenge established readings through personal insight

This distinction helps explain why literary criticism may remain more resistant to AI disruption than more fact-oriented fields like certain types of historical analysis.

Hard-to-Replicate Literary Criticism vs. Historical Analysis

Literary Criticism That AI Struggles to Replicate

1. Edward Said’s “Orientalism” (1978)

What makes it difficult for AI: Said’s groundbreaking work emerged directly from his lived experience as a Palestinian scholar in western academia. His personal position at cultural crossroads enabled him to identify patterns of colonial representation that had been normalized within western scholarship. AI lacks this lived experience of cultural marginalization and the emotional investment that drove Said’s recognition of problematic patterns.

2. Judith Butler’s “Gender Trouble” (1990)

What makes it difficult for AI: Butler’s radical rethinking of gender as performative rather than essential emerged from personal engagement with queer theory and feminist philosophy. The work’s provocative and challenging examination of fundamental cultural assumptions required a willingness to pursue counterintuitive insights and make creative theoretical leaps that AI systems, trained on existing patterns, typically avoid.

3. Susan Sontag’s “Against Interpretation” (1966)

What makes it difficult for AI: Sontag’s essay rejects systematic analysis in favour of direct experiential engagement with art. Her criticism of the interpretive tradition represents a meta-critical stance informed by her personal aesthetic experiences and philosophical convictions. AI systems, which excel at systematic interpretation, would struggle to authentically advocate for its abandonment.

4. Harold Bloom’s “The Anxiety of Influence” (1973)

What makes it difficult for AI: Bloom’s theory of poetic influence draws on his deeply personal reading history and psychological insight into creative processes. His framework reflects a nuanced understanding of the emotional and psychological struggles that poets face as they grapple with their predecessors. AI lacks the anxiety, ambition, and creative struggle that inform Bloom’s theoretical perspective.

5. Gayatri Spivak’s “Can the Subaltern Speak?” (1988)

What makes it difficult for AI: Spivak’s postcolonial critique emerges from her personal experience navigating between Western academic institutions and her Bengali cultural background. Her analysis of how power structures silence marginalized voices reflects lived understanding of intersectional marginality that AI, trained primarily on established scholarly discourse, cannot authentically reproduce.

Historical Analysis More Amenable to AI Approaches

1. Robert Darnton’s “The Great Cat Massacre” (1984)

Why it’s more replicable: While innovative in its cultural analysis, Darnton’s work adheres to established methodological approaches in cultural history. The analysis is derived from a systematic examination of documented historical events and primary sources, following standard historical methods that can be algorithmically modelled.

2. David Christian’s “Maps of Time” (2004)

Why it’s more replicable: This “Big History” approach synthesizes findings across multiple scientific and historical disciplines into a coherent timeline. The systematic integration of established knowledge from physics, geology, biology, archeology, and history follows logical patterns that AI systems could potentially reproduce.

3. Fernand Braudel’s “The Mediterranean” (1949)

Why it’s more replicable: Braudel’s analysis of Mediterranean history through different time scales (geographical, social, and individual) uses a structured analytical framework that examines how physical geography shapes human history. This systematic approach, while innovative, follows reproducible methodological principles.

4. Thomas Piketty’s “Capital in the Twenty-First Century” (2013)

Why it’s more replicable: Piketty’s analysis of economic inequality relies heavily on quantitative data analysis and statistical patterns. The methodical examination of economic records and mathematical modeling of wealth distribution follows systematic analytical processes that AI systems excel at.

5. Jared Diamond’s “Guns, Germs, and Steel” (1997)

Why it’s more replicable: Diamond’s explanation for Eurasian dominance follows a structured comparative analysis of geographical and environmental factors. The systematic evaluation of how geography affected historical development uses causal reasoning that could be modeled algorithmically.

The Key Differences

The literary criticism examples demonstrate how the field values:

Personal cultural positioning that informs what patterns are recognized
Willingness to challenge fundamental assumptions
Autobiographical elements that shape critical perspective
Creative theoretical leaps beyond existing discourse
Advocacy for particular aesthetic or ethical positions

Meanwhile, the historical analysis examples, while still requiring human judgment, demonstrate:

Systematic evaluation of documented evidence
Structured analytical frameworks
Pattern recognition across historical data
Logical reasoning about cause and effect
Integration of findings from multiple sources

These differences suggest why AI systems may be more readily able to assist with or potentially reproduce certain kinds of historical analysis, while literary criticism’s reliance on personal perspective and creative theoretical insight remains more distinctly human.

Maxthon

To safeguard your online banking details when using the Maxthon browser, take the following essential steps. First and foremost, it’s crucial to create strong passwords for your banking account. This means developing unique and intricate passwords that mix uppercase and lowercase letters with numbers and special characters. Steer clear of easily guessable information, such as birthdays or pet names.

Next, if your bank offers Two-Factor Authentication (2FA), be sure to enable it. This feature adds a security layer by requiring you to input a code sent to you via text or email alongside your password.

Keeping your Maxthon browser updated is also vital; make a habit of checking for updates regularly. New versions typically come with security enhancements and patches that help protect against potential vulnerabilities.

Another essential practice is frequently clearing your browsing data. By regularly removing your history, cache, and cookies, you eliminate any stored sensitive information that hackers could exploit if they gain access to your device.

Utilising Maxthon’s privacy mode is another effective way to enhance security during online banking sessions. This feature allows you to browse without saving any data, such as cookies or site information, from those sessions.

In addition, consider installing reputable security extensions or antivirus plugins compatible with Maxthon. These tools can offer real-time protection against threats such as phishing attacks and malware.

It’s also wise to remain vigilant about phishing scams. Always verify the URL of the banking website before logging in, and exercise caution regarding links sent through emails or messages purporting to be from your bank—only click them if you’re confident they’re legitimate.

Finally, remember to log out after completing any transactions in your online banking session. Doing so helps prevent unauthorised access should someone else use your device afterwards.
Implementing these strategies can significantly enhance the security of your online banking endeavours when using the Maxthon browser.

AI’s Impact on Publishing