The Economist highlights a concerning trend in global bond markets, where government borrowing costs are rising sharply across major economies. Let me break down the key points and implications:

The Core Problem

The article centres on a psychological barrier being broken: US 30-year Treasury yields have stayed above 5% since May 21st, 2025. This “round number” milestone has spooked investors because it represents a significant shift in what was once considered the world’s safest investment.

Why This Matters Globally

The US economy’s massive size (26% of global output) means its fiscal problems don’t stay contained. When America runs large deficits – currently $2 trillion annually or 6.9% of GDP – it affects global capital markets. Higher US borrowing costs ripple outward, forcing other countries to offer higher yields to remain competitive for investor capital.

The Worldwide Spread

The contagion is already visible:

Britain: 30-year yields hit 5.5%, the highest since 1998
Germany: At 3.1%, approaching levels not seen since the eurozone debt crisis
Japan: 30-year yields reached a record high of nearly 3.2%

Multiple Pressure Points

The article identifies several factors driving this trend:

Political and Policy Uncertainty: Trump’s budget policies, tariff threats, and institutional challenges have undermined confidence in US fiscal stability.

Inflation Resurgence: Both Britain and Japan are seeing unexpectedly high inflation (3.5% in both countries), forcing investors to demand higher yields to compensate for eroding purchasing power.

Structural Demand Changes: A crucial point often overlooked – the traditional big buyers of long-term government bonds (pension funds, endowments) have already secured the bonds they need at attractive rates and are stepping back from the market.

The Concerning Implication

The article suggests we may be witnessing a fundamental shift. For years, bond traders assumed that 5% was effectively a ceiling for 30-year Treasury yields because institutional investors would rush in to buy at those attractive levels. But if those buyers have already “filled their boots,” as the article puts it, fiscal concerns could intensify significantly.

This represents a potential end to the era of cheap government borrowing that has characterised much of the post-2008 financial crisis period. It has implications for everything from national debt sustainability to the cost of financing infrastructure and social programs globally.

Bond Yields and Fiscal Stability: Global Impact and Singapore Analysis

How Rising Bond Yields Threaten Fiscal Stability

The Debt Service Spiral

When bond yields rise, governments face several interconnected fiscal pressures:

Immediate Impact on New Borrowing

Higher yields mean governments must pay more interest on new debt issuances
Countries with significant financing needs (like the US with its $2 trillion annual deficit) face dramatically higher costs
Example: A 1% increase in yields on $2 trillion of new borrowing adds $20 billion annually in interest payments

Rollover Risk

Most government debt isn’t perpetual – bonds mature and must be refinanced
As older, cheaper debt matures, governments must replace it with higher-cost borrowing
This creates a “refinancing cliff” where debt service costs compound over time

Crowding Out Effect

Higher interest payments consume a larger share of government budgets
Less money available for infrastructure, social programs, and economic investment
Can force governments into austerity measures or higher taxes, both potentially growth-dampening

Confidence Feedback Loop

Rising borrowing costs can signal fiscal distress to markets
This can trigger further yield increases as investors demand higher risk premiums
In extreme cases, it leads to sovereign debt crises (as seen in Europe, 2010-2012)

Market Dynamics Amplifying the Problem

Reduced Institutional Demand

Traditional large buyers (pension funds, insurance companies) have reduced their purchases.
Central banks are also reducing bond holdings as they normalise monetary policy.
Supply-demand imbalance pushes yields higher

Global Contagion

US fiscal problems affect global capital allocation
Investors may demand higher yields from all governments as risk assessment changes
“Flight to quality” becomes less effective if even “safe” assets carry higher yields

Singapore’s Position and Vulnerabilities

Singapore’s Fiscal Strengths

Strong Fundamentals

Net creditor position: Singapore has more assets than liabilities
Substantial fiscal reserves through GIC and Temasek Holdings
Low debt-to-GDP ratio compared to developed economies
History of fiscal prudence and balanced budgets

Unique Debt Structure

Singapore Government Securities (SGS) are issued primarily for market development, not financing needs
The government doesn’t rely heavily on debt financing due to its strong fiscal position
Central Provident Fund (CPF) provides a stable domestic demand for government bonds

Potential Impact Channels on Singapore

1. Cost of Capital Effects

Even with strong fundamentals, Singapore may need to offer higher yields to remain competitive.
Corporate borrowing costs are likely to rise, affecting business investment.
Mortgage rates and consumer credit costs may increase.e

2. Currency and Capital Flow Pressures

Higher US yields could strengthen the USD against the SGD
Potential capital outflows as investors chase higher yields in US Treasuries
MAS may need to adjust the monetary policy stance to maintain exchange rate stability

3. Economic Growth Implications

Singapore’s export-dependent economy is vulnerable to the global growth slowdown
Higher global borrowing costs could reduce international trade and investment
The financial services sector may face headwinds if global credit conditions tighten

4. Regional Spillovers

Many of Singapore’s ASEAN trading partners have weaker fiscal positions
Regional sovereign debt stress could affect Singapore’s banks and trade relationships
Supply chain disruptions occur if regional economies face fiscal constraints

5. Financial Sector Impact

Singapore’s banks have exposures to regional sovereign debt
Higher yields could lead to mark-to-market losses on existing bond portfolios
Credit costs may rise as economic conditions deteriorate globally

Singapore’s Policy Options and Responses

Monetary Policy Tools

Exchange Rate Management: MAS could adjust the SGD nominal effective exchange rate policy band
Liquidity Management: Provide adequate liquidity to maintain financial stability
Coordination: Work with regional central banks to manage spillover effects

Fiscal Policy Considerations

Counter-cyclical Spending: Use fiscal reserves to support the economy if global conditions deteriorate
Infrastructure Investment: Take advantage of any domestic capacity freed up by reduced private investment
Tax Policy: Potential adjustments to maintain competitiveness while preserving fiscal strength

Structural Adaptations

Diversification: Continue efforts to diversify the economy beyond traditional sectors
Financial Hub Strategy: Position Singapore as an alternative financial centre if global markets fragment
Regional Integration: Strengthen ASEAN financial cooperation mechanisms

Risk Assessment for Singapore

Low-Probability, High-Impact Scenarios

Global Financial Crisis 2.0: Widespread sovereign debt distress leading to global recession
USD Dominance Challenge: Fundamental shift in global reserve currency system
Regional Contagion: Major ASEAN economy facing a debt crisis

Medium-Probability Scenarios

Prolonged Higher Rates: An Extended period of elevated global borrowing costs
Growth Slowdown: Gradual reduction in global economic growth rates
Trade Disruption: Increased protectionism and reduced international commerce

Policy Preparation

Singapore’s strong institutional frameworks and fiscal position provide significant buffers, but preparation should include:

Stress testing of the financial system under various yield scenarios
Contingency planning for capital flow management
Enhanced regional coordination mechanisms
Continued diversification of the economic base

Conclusion

While Singapore’s strong fiscal position and institutional quality provide substantial protection against rising bond yield pressures, the country cannot remain entirely insulated from global trends. The key risks lie not in Singapore’s own fiscal sustainability, but in the broader economic consequences of tighter global financial conditions and their impact on trade, investment, and regional stability.

Singapore’s policy responses should focus on maintaining financial stability, supporting economic adaptation, and leveraging its strong fiscal position to provide counter-cyclical support if needed. The country’s experience navigating previous global financial disruptions suggests it is well-positioned to manage these challenges, but vigilance and proactive policy preparation remain essential.

The Bond Yield Crisis: Deep Analysis and Singapore Impact

Part I: The Mechanics of Fiscal Destruction

The Compound Interest Nightmare

Rising bond yields create a fiscal death spiral that most governments are ill-equipped to handle. The mathematics is brutal and unforgiving.

Consider a government with $10 trillion in debt and an average maturity of 7 years. In noregularrimes, with 2% yields, annual interest payments consume $200 billion. But when yields jump to 5%, the story changes dramatically. Not immediately – existing bonds continue paying their original rates – but inexorably, as old debt matures and must be refinanced.

Year 1: Only 14% of debt ($1.4 trillion) needs refinancing. Interest costs rise by $42 billion. Year 3: Half the debt has been refinanced. Additional annual interest burden: $210 billion. Year 7: All debt refinanced at higher rates. Total additional cost: $300 billion annually.

This isn’t theoretical. It’s the mathematical certainty facing every government as yields remain elevated.

The Debt Sustainability Equation

Economists use a simple formula to assess debt sustainability:

Debt-to-GDP ratio tomorrow = Debt-to-GDP ratio today × (1 + real interest rate – real GDP growth rate)

When bond yields rise faster than economic growth, this ratio explodes upward. The “r > g” problem – where the real interest rate exceeds real growth – has historically preceded most sovereign debt crises.

For context:

US: Real growth ~2%, real borrowing costs approaching 3%
UK: Real growth ~1.5%, real borrowing costs ~2.5%
Germany: Real growth ~1%, real borrowing costs ~1.5%

All major economies now face negative debt dynamics, which means that debt burdens will grow faster than their ability to service them.

The Liquidity Trap

Higher yields don’t just increase costs – they can cut off access to funding entirely. Markets can become “gappy,” where small amounts of selling cause large price drops. This is particularly dangerous for governments with:

High refinancing needs (short average debt maturity)
Large primary deficits requiring constant new borrowing
Political instability that amplifies market concerns

When markets lose confidence, the cost of borrowing can spiral beyond any government’s ability to pay, regardless of underlying economic strength.

Central Bank Impotence

Traditional monetary policy becomes less effective when fiscal and monetary policy conflict. Central banks trying to lower rates to support growth may find their efforts overwhelmed by fiscal concerns driving yields higher. The Bank of England discovered this during the Liz Truss crisis in 2022, when fiscal irresponsibility forced monetary policy into an impossible position.

Part II: Singapore’s Unique Position and Vulnerabilities

The Singapore Advantage

Singapore operates with what economists call a “fiscal space” – the gap between current debt levels and unsustainable levels. This space is enormous:

Net Asset Position: Singapore’s government owns more assets than liabilities:

Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC): ~$690 billion
Temasek Holdings: ~$380 billion
Monetary Authority of Singapore reserves: ~$350 billion
Land and other assets: Substantial but unquantified

Revenue Strength: Singapore generates budget surpluses in most years through:

Efficient tax collection (low evasion, broad base)
Land sales revenue
Returns from sovereign wealth funds
Strategic economic positioning

Hidden Vulnerabilities

Despite these strengths, Singapore faces three critical vulnerabilities:

1. The Dollar Trap

Singapore’s monetary policy is based on managing the Singapore Dollar Nominal Effective Exchange Rate (S$NEER). When US yields rise dramatically, this creates pressure on the MAS to either:

Allow the SGD to weaken (importing inflation)
Tighten monetary policy (slowing domestic growth)
Intervene heavily in currency markets (depleting reserves)

None of these options is costless, and the pressure intensifies if yield differentials persist.

2. The Financial Hub Paradox

Singapore’s success as a financial centre creates systemic risk. The country hosts:

$4+ trillion in assets under management
Major regional banking operations
Extensive derivative and structured product markets

Rising global yields could trigger:

Capital flight as investors chase higher US yields
Banking sector stress from mark-to-market losses
Reduced financial services revenue as global activity declines

3. The Trade Dependence Challenge

Singapore’s trade-to-GDP ratio exceeds 300%, making it extraordinarily sensitive to global economic conditions. Higher borrowing costs worldwide are reduced:

International trade finance availability
Corporate investment in Singapore’s trading partners
Demand for Singapore’s logistics and financial services

Transmission Mechanisms

Rising bond yields affect Singapore through several channels:

Direct Financial Impact:

Government of Singapore Securities (SGS) yields rise in tandem with global rates
Sovereign wealth fund bond portfolios face mark-to-market losses
Corporate borrowing costs increase, reducing investment

Banking Sector Stress:

Net interest margins may initially improve, but credit losses could follow
Regional exposure to higher-risk sovereigns creates potential losses
Reduced lending activity as risk premiums rise

Real Economy Effects:

Higher mortgage rates cool property markets
Reduced consumer spending as borrowing costs rise
Foreign investment declines as global capital becomes more expensive

Part III: A Singapore Story

The Bond Trader’s Dilemma

Marina Bay Financial Centre, 6:47 AM, May 28th, 2025

Wei Ming’s coffee had gone cold an hour ago, but he hadn’t noticed. The Bloomberg terminal in front of him painted a picture that would have seemed impossible just months earlier: US 30-year yields holding steady at 5.15%, German Bunds approaching 3.2%, and most unnervingly, Singapore Government Securities 20-year bonds trading at 4.8%.

“This shouldn’t be happening,” he muttered, adjusting his wire-rimmed glasses. After fifteen years managing fixed-income portfolios for one of Singapore’s largest insurance companies, Wei Ming had built his career on the bedrock assumption that certain things were simply true: the US would never default, German bonds were Europe’s anchor, and Singapore’s fiscal position was unassailable.

His phone buzzed. A message from his portfolio manager reader: “Board meeting at 9 AM. We needed to explain our SGS positions and duration risk. Come prepared.”

Wei Ming’s fund held S$12 billion in Singapore Government Securities, purchased over the years when yields were much lower. With the recent spike, the portfolio was showing paper losses of nearly S$800 million. For any other sovereign, this might be dismissed as temporary volatility. But Singapore wasn’t supposed to trade like other sovereigns.

He pulled up the research note from Goldman Sachs that had been circulating since dawn: “Singapore’s fundamental strength remains intact, but global yield dynamics are forcing a repricing of all sovereign risk. Even the strongest credits cannot escape the gravitational pull of US fiscal concerns.”

8:15 AM, Raffles Place

Walking to the office, Wei Ming raced through the implications. Singapore’s government didn’t actually need to borrow money—the SGS market existed primarily to provide a benchmark for corporate issuers and to give institutional investors like his fund a place to park money safely. But that was precisely the problem.

If global yields kept rising, institutional investors would have alternatives. Why buy 20-year SGS at 4.8% when US Treasuries offered 5.1%? Yes, currency risk was a factor, but for many international investors, the dollar’s strength made that risk asymmetric in America’s favour.

His phone rang. “Wei Ming, this is Director Chen from MAS. We’re convening an emergency meeting of major SGS holders at 10 AM. Can you attend?”

“Of course,” he replied, though his stomach tightened. In his fifteen years in the market, MAS had never called such a meeting.

10 AM, Monetary Authority of Singapore

The conference room at MAS was filled with familiar faces – portfolio managers from GIC, Temasek, the major local banks, and foreign asset managers with significant SGS holdings. Deputy Managing Director Sarah Teo addressed the room with characteristic directness.

“Colleagues, we’re facing an unprecedented situation. Global bond yields are rising due to fiscal concerns in the United States and other major economies, but Singapore is being caught in the undertow despite our strong fundamentals.”

She clicked to the first slide: “SGS 10-year yields have risen 150 basis points in six weeks. This is faster than during the 2013 taper tantrum or the March 2020 crisis. The difference is that those were driven by monetary policy or liquidity concerns. This is structural.”

Wei Ming raised his hand. “Director Teo, what are the implications for our domestic economy? My clients are asking whether they should be hedging their SGD exposure.”

“That’s exactly why we’re here,” she replied. “We need to understand how much of this is fundamental repricing versus temporary dislocation. If it’s the former, we need to adapt. If it’s the latter, we need to determine whether intervention is warranted.”

Dr. Liu from GIC leaned forward. “Our analysis suggests this is largely fundamental. The era of ultra-low rates is ending globally. Even Singapore, with our pristine balance sheet, cannot completely decouple from global yield dynamics.”

The Afternoon Realisation

Back at his desk, Wei Ming stared at a chart showing the correlation between US Treasury yields and SGS yields over the past decade. The correlation had always been high – around 0.8 – but in recent weeks, it had approached 0.95. Singapore’s sovereign bonds were trading almost perfectly in line with US Treasuries, adjusted for currency and credit risk.

This meant Singapore’s monetary policy independence was more constrained than anyone had realised. If US fiscal problems kept pushing Treasury yields higher, Singapore would face an impossible choice: allow SGS yields to rise in tandem (tightening domestic financial conditions) or intervene heavily to suppress yields (potentially depleting foreign reserves and creating currency pressure).

His colleague Janet, who managed the corporate bond portfolio, stopped by his desk. “Wei Ming, have you seen what’s happening in the corporate market? DBS’s new 10-year bonds are pricing at 5.2%. Six months ago, they would have priced it at 3.5%. Our entire investment thesis is breaking down.”

She was right. Singapore’s corporate bond market has always been priced at modest spreads to SGS. If SGS yields were rising due to global factors rather than Singapore-specific risks, corporate borrowers were facing dramatically higher costs through no fault of their own. This would ripple through the economy in ways that would make Singapore’s export-dependent growth model even more challenging.

Evening Reflection

That night, Wei Ming sat in his Tiong Bahru apartment, looking out at the city skyline. The lights of Marina Bay reflected off the water, but the view that usually calmed him now seemed to shimmer with uncertainty.

He thought about his daughter, starting university in the fall. Her generation would inherit a world where the financial certainties that had defined Singapore’s rise were no longer certain. The assumption that careful fiscal management guaranteed low borrowing costs was being tested by forces beyond any single country’s control.

His phone buzzed with a message from his counterpart in Hong Kong: “Seeing the same patterns here. HKSAR 10-year bonds hit 4.9% today. Even countries with strong balance sheets can’t escape global gravity.”

Wei Ming opened his laptop and began drafting his analysis for tomorrow’s board meeting. The title came to him immediately: “The End of Sovereign Exceptionalism: Why Even Singapore Cannot Escape Global Yield Dynamics.”

As he typed, he realised he was documenting more than a market shift. He was witnessing the end of an era where fiscal virtue alone could guarantee access to cheap capital. The world was becoming more expensive for everyone, even those who had done everything right.

The Next Morning

Board Room, 9 AM Sharp

“Ladies and gentlemen,” Wei Ming began, “we are facing a fundamental shift in global bond markets that will require us to rethink our investment strategy, our risk management, and our understanding of sovereign credit.”

He clicked to his first slide: “The correlation between US Treasury yields and Singapore Government Securities has reached historical highs. This means Singapore’s cost of capital is now largely determined by American fiscal policy, regardless of our own fundamentals.”

The chairman, Mr. Tan, frowned. “Are you suggesting that Singapore’s bonds are now as risky as American bonds?”

“Not in terms of default risk,” Wei Ming replied carefully. “But in terms of market pricing, yes. Global investors are demanding higher yields from all sovereigns because the fundamental assumptions about government borrowing capacity are changing.”

He advanced to the next slide, which showed projected interest costs for various scenarios: “If current yield levels persist, Singapore’s government will face higher borrowing costs even though our fiscal position remains strong. More importantly, our domestic economy will face tighter financial conditions imposed by global rather than local factors.”

The implications were staggering. Singapore had spent decades building fiscal credibility to ensure policy independence. But in a globally integrated financial system, even the strongest sovereigns could find their monetary policy constrained by events beyond their borders.

The Investment Decision

“So what do we do?” asked the chief investment officer.

Wei Ming had spent the night thinking about this question. “We need to fundamentally restructure our approach. First, we reduce our duration risk by shortening the average maturity of our bond holdings. Second, we increase our allocation to inflation-protected securities. Third, we begin hedging our interest rate exposure more actively.”

“But most importantly,” he continued, “we need to prepare for a world where ‘risk-free’ rates are no longer low. This will affect everything from our liability matching to our return expectations.”

As the meeting concluded, Wei Ming realised that his job had fundamentally changed. For fifteen years, he had been a bond investor in a world of declining yields and expanding central bank support. Now he was becoming a risk manager in an era of fiscal limits and monetary constraints.

The Singapore story wasn’t ending – the country’s fundamentals remained strong, its institutions robust, and its policy flexibility substantial. But the era of cheap capital that had helped finance Singapore’s transformation was drawing to a close, replaced by a more uncertain world where even the most prudent governments would face higher costs and tougher choices.

Walking back to his office, Wei Ming felt the weight of this transition. He was living through a historical inflexion point, documenting the end of the post-2008 era of ultra-low interest rates and unlimited central bank support. The world was becoming more expensive, and even Singapore, despite doing everything right, could not entirely escape the new reality.

Epilogue: The Broader Implications

Wei Ming’s story illustrates the profound challenge facing even the strongest sovereigns in the current environment. Singapore’s experience demonstrates that in a globally integrated financial system, fiscal virtue alone may not be sufficient to maintain access to cheap capital.

The implications extend far beyond bond markets. Higher borrowing costs will affect:

Infrastructure investment plans
Social program sustainability
Corporate expansion decisions
Real estate markets
Currency stability

Singapore’s challenge is maintaining its competitive advantage in a world where capital costs are rising globally. The country’s strong institutions and policy flexibility provide necessary buffers, but cannot entirely insulate it from global trends.

The bond yield crisis of 2025 may well be remembered as the moment when the post-financial crisis era of cheap money definitively ended, ushering in a new period where governments worldwide must confront the fiscal limits that had been temporarily suspended by extraordinary monetary policy.

Singapore’s response to this challenge will likely serve as a model for other well-managed economies navigating the transition to a higher-cost capital environment. The question is whether the lessons learned will come quickly enough to prevent broader economic disruption.

Maxthon

In an age where the digital world is in constant flux and our interactions online are ever-evolving, the importance of prioritising individuals as they navigate the expansive internet cannot be overstated. The myriad of elements that shape our online experiences calls for a thoughtful approach to selecting web browsers—one that places a premium on security and user privacy. Amidst the multitude of browsers vying for users’ loyalty, Maxthon emerges as a standout choice, providing a trustworthy solution to these pressing concerns, all without any cost to the user.

Maxthon, with its advanced features, boasts a comprehensive suite of built-in tools designed to enhance your online privacy. Among these tools are a highly effective ad blocker and a range of anti-tracking mechanisms, each meticulously crafted to fortify your digital sanctuary. This browser has carved out a niche for itself, particularly with its seamless compatibility with Windows 11, further solidifying its reputation in an increasingly competitive market.

In a crowded landscape of web browsers, Maxthon has forged a distinct identity through its unwavering dedication to offering a secure and private browsing experience. Fully aware of the myriad threats lurking in the vast expanse of cyberspace, Maxthon works tirelessly to safeguard your personal information. Utilising state-of-the-art encryption technology, it ensures that your sensitive data remains protected and confidential throughout your online adventures.

What truly sets Maxthon apart is its commitment to enhancing user privacy during every moment spent online. Each feature of this browser has been meticulously designed with the user’s privacy in mind. Its powerful ad-blocking capabilities work diligently to eliminate unwanted advertisements, while its comprehensive anti-tracking measures effectively reduce the presence of invasive scripts that could disrupt your browsing enjoyment. As a result, users can traverse the web with newfound confidence and safety.

Moreover, Maxthon’s incognito mode provides an extra layer of security, granting users enhanced anonymity while engaging in their online pursuits. This specialised mode not only conceals your browsing habits but also ensures that your digital footprint remains minimal, allowing for an unobtrusive and liberating internet experience. With Maxthon as your ally in the digital realm, you can explore the vastness of the internet with peace of mind, knowing that your privacy is being prioritised every step of the way.

Rising global bond yields threaten fiscal stability