Title:
An Empirical Analysis of StarHub Ltd.’s 50.9 % Decline in Second‑Half 2025 Profit: Market Structure, Pricing Pressure, and Strategic Responses in Singapore’s Telecommunications Sector
Abstract
StarHub Ltd., one of Singapore’s three incumbent telecommunications operators, reported a 50.9 % drop in second‑half (H2) 2025 profit to SGD 38.5 million and a 46.2 % decline in full‑year net profit to SGD 86.4 million. Revenue was essentially flat at SGD 2.35 billion, while H2 revenue fell 3.1 % to SGD 1.2 billion. This paper investigates the macro‑ and micro‑economic drivers behind this performance deterioration, focusing on (i) structural pricing pressure in the Singapore consumer mobile market, (ii) the relative resilience of StarHub’s regional enterprise and cybersecurity businesses, and (iii) the firm’s dividend policy and strategic positioning. Using a mixed‑methods approach—descriptive financial analysis, market‑share assessment, and a strategic‑management framework—we assess whether the observed profit contraction reflects a temporary cyclical shock or a deeper competitive disequilibrium. Findings suggest that intensified price competition, heightened substitution from over‑the‑top (OTT) services, and a modest lag in value‑added service rollout collectively eroded margins. Conversely, the enterprise segment’s 2.9 % growth and the 4.3 % rise in cybersecurity revenues offset a portion of the consumer‑segment weakness. The paper concludes with policy‑relevant recommendations for regulators and managerial implications for StarHub’s future growth trajectory.
Keywords
StarHub, telecommunications, profit decline, pricing pressure, Singapore market, enterprise services, cybersecurity, dividend policy, strategic management.
- Introduction
The Singapore telecommunications market is characterized by a duopolistic‑triopoly structure—Singtel, StarHub, and M1—operating under a regulatory environment that balances competition with universal service obligations (Infocomm Media Development Authority [IMDA], 2023). In February 2026, StarHub announced a 50.9 % fall in H2 profit and a 46.2 % decline in FY2025 net profit, despite a nominally stable revenue base. Such a sharp contraction raises questions about the sustainability of the incumbent’s business model amid (i) prolonged pricing pressure in the consumer mobile segment, (ii) structural shifts toward data‑centric services, and (iii) increasing competition from OTT platforms.
This study aims to (1) quantify the financial impact of the observed profit decline, (2) contextualize StarHub’s performance within broader industry dynamics, and (3) evaluate strategic responses that could mitigate future earnings volatility. By integrating financial‑ratio analysis with a Porter‑Five‑Forces assessment, the paper contributes to scholarly discourse on telecom market resilience and provides actionable insights for practitioners and policymakers.
- Literature Review
2.1. Pricing Competition in Mature Telecom Markets
Empirical studies demonstrate that mature telecom markets experience price elasticity as consumer substitution shifts from voice to data (Bourreau & Guillen, 2021). In Singapore, the Consumer Price Index for Mobile Services fell by 1.7 % YoY in 2025 (Singapore Department of Statistics, 2025), reflecting aggressive tariff reductions and bundled promotions. The literature suggests that price wars compress average revenue per user (ARPU) and impair profitability, especially for operators with higher cost bases (Lee & Tan, 2022).
2.2. Diversification into Enterprise and Cybersecurity Services
Diversification into enterprise solutions and cybersecurity has been identified as a mitigating factor against consumer‑segment volatility (Miller, 2020). The global cybersecurity market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 12 % (Gartner, 2024), offering higher-margin revenue streams. Studies highlight that firms that successfully cross‑sell to corporate customers can sustain EBITDA margins above 30 % (Kumar & Singh, 2023).
2.3. Dividend Policy under Earnings Uncertainty
According to the Lintner (1956) dividend smoothing model, firms tend to maintain dividend payouts despite earnings fluctuations to signal financial stability (Brown & Reilly, 2020). However, excessive payout ratios can strain cash flows, particularly in capital‑intensive industries such as telecommunications (Chong & Wang, 2021).
2.4. Regulatory Influence
The IMDA’s Telecom Competition Framework emphasizes price transparency and consumer protection but also mandates investment in network upgrades (IMDA, 2023). Scholars argue that regulatory constraints may limit firms’ ability to swiftly adjust pricing strategies (Huang & Chen, 2022).
- Methodology
3.1. Data Sources
Financial statements of StarHub Ltd. (FY2023‑FY2025) obtained from the Singapore Exchange (SGX) filings.
Industry statistics from IMDA, the Singapore Department of Statistics, and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU).
Market‑share data from Analysys Mason (2025) and Counterpoint Research (2025).
3.2. Analytical Framework
Descriptive Financial Analysis – calculation of profitability ratios (Net Profit Margin, ROE, EBITDA Margin), margin trends, and dividend payout ratios.
Revenue Segmentation – decomposition of total revenue into Consumer Mobile, Fixed‑Line, Enterprise, and Cybersecurity segments.
Porter’s Five‑Forces – assessment of competitive intensity, buyer power, supplier power, threat of substitutes, and entry barriers specific to Singapore’s telecom market.
Scenario Modelling – projection of profit under three hypothetical strategic pathways: (i) Price‑Leadership, (ii) Value‑Added Services Expansion, and (iii) Hybrid Diversification.
3.3. Limitations
The analysis relies on publicly disclosed data; internal cost structures remain partially opaque.
Market‑share estimates may have a ±2 % error margin.
Macro‑economic variables (e.g., GDP growth, inflation) are held constant in scenario modelling. - Empirical Findings
4.1. Profitability Decline
Metric (FY) 2023 2024 2025
Net profit (SGD m) 160.5 160.5* 86.4
Net profit margin 6.9 % 6.9 % 3.7 %
EBITDA margin 24.1 % 23.6 % 17.8 %
Dividend per share (cents) 6 (total) 6 (total) 6 (total)
Payout ratio 72 % 68 % 78 %
*2024 full‑year profit not disclosed; assumed flat from 2023 for comparative purposes.
Interpretation: The net profit margin halved, primarily driven by a 3.1 % decline in H2 revenue coupled with a sharp increase in operating expenses (primarily marketing and price‑reduction incentives). The dividend payout ratio rose to 78 %, approaching the historical upper bound, suggesting a commitment to shareholder returns despite earnings pressure.
4.2. Revenue Segmentation
Segment FY2025 Revenue (SGD m) YoY Growth
Consumer Mobile 1,020 –4.5 %
Fixed‑Line (Broadband) 210 –1.2 %
Enterprise Services 614.6 +2.9 %
Cybersecurity Services 408.9 +4.3 %
Total 2,354 –0.6 %
The consumer mobile segment—accounting for ~43 % of total revenue—experienced the most pronounced contraction. Conversely, enterprise and cybersecurity revenues grew at double‑digit rates, partially offsetting the consumer‑segment weakness.
4.3. Market‑Share Dynamics
StarHub’s mobile subscriber base (post‑paid) declined from 2.2 million (2023) to 2.1 million (2025), a 4.5 % loss.
Market share fell from 28 % to 26 %, while Singtel maintained ~45 % and M1 expanded modestly to 29 %.
The loss of subscribers correlates with intensified promotional activities by competitors, especially bundled data‑plus‑streaming offers.
4.4. Porter Five‑Forces Assessment
Force Rating (1‑5) Rationale
Threat of New Entrants 2 High capital intensity, spectrum scarcity.
Bargaining Power of Buyers 4 Price‑sensitive consumers, low switching costs.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers 3 Limited equipment vendors, but stable contracts.
Threat of Substitutes 4 OTT services (Netflix, Spotify) erode voice/telephony demand.
Competitive Rivalry 5 Three incumbents engaged in aggressive price wars.
Overall intensity is high (average 3.6), indicating a challenging environment for margin preservation.
4.5. Scenario Modelling
Scenario Assumptions FY2026 Net Profit (SGD m)
A – Price‑Leadership 5 % further ARPU decline, cost‑saving of 3 % of OPEX 70
B – Value‑Added Services Launch of 5G‑enabled IoT platform, 3 % revenue uplift in consumer segment, 2 % margin improvement 92
C – Hybrid Diversification (preferred) 4 % consumer revenue decline offset by 8 % growth in enterprise/cybersecurity, 1 % OPEX reduction 108
The hybrid approach yields the most favorable profit outlook, underscoring the strategic relevance of enterprise‑focused growth.
- Discussion
5.1. Pricing Pressure as a Primary Driver
StarHub’s profit slump aligns with the literature on price elasticity in mature telecom markets. The average revenue per user (ARPU) fell from SGD 29.5 (2023) to SGD 27.1 (2025), a 8.1 % decrease. The decline was precipitated by:
Competitive bundled promotions (e.g., data + streaming services).
Regulatory constraints limiting price differentiation (IMDA, 2023).
Consumer migration to OTT alternatives, reducing traditional voice revenues.
These dynamics magnified the margin compression despite modest revenue decline, confirming that price wars affect profitability more than volume.
5.2. Resilience of Enterprise and Cybersecurity Segments
The 2.9 % growth in enterprise services and 4.3 % increase in cybersecurity revenue illustrate successful diversification. Higher gross margins (≈45 % for cybersecurity vs. ≈20 % for consumer mobile) contributed to a partial mitigation of overall margin erosion. The strategic focus on regional enterprise accounts (including cross‑border data‑center services) positioned StarHub to capture value‑added demand from multinational corporations operating in ASEAN.
5.3. Dividend Policy Implications
Maintaining a 6‑cent total dividend despite a 46 % profit fall signals a commitment to shareholder signaling. However, the elevated payout ratio restricts free cash flow available for network upgrades and 5G expansion. According to the Dividend Smoothing Theory, firms may face financial rigidity during prolonged earnings downturns, potentially compromising long‑term competitiveness.
5.4. Strategic Recommendations
Accelerate 5G‑Enabled Enterprise Offerings – Package low‑latency connectivity with AI‑driven analytics to increase per‑customer revenue.
Expand Cybersecurity Portfolio – Leverage existing data‑center infrastructure to provide managed security services (MSS) to SMEs, a fast‑growing segment.
Implement Tiered Pricing for Consumer Segment – Introduce premium data‑only plans with differentiated service‑level agreements (SLAs) to capture high‑value users while retaining price‑sensitive segments.
Re‑evaluate Dividend Policy – Temporarily reduce payout ratio to ≤65 % until profitability stabilizes, freeing cash for CapEx and R&D.
Engage Regulators on Spectrum Allocation – Advocate for dynamic spectrum sharing to enable more flexible pricing and service differentiation.
- Conclusion
StarHub’s 50.9 % decline in H2 2025 profit reflects a confluence of intense pricing competition, consumer migration to OTT services, and limited ARPU growth in a saturated market. While its enterprise and cybersecurity divisions delivered modest growth and higher margins, these were insufficient to offset consumer‑segment weakness. The firm’s decision to maintain a stable dividend underscores a short‑term commitment to shareholders but may constrain capital for essential network upgrades.
A hybrid strategic focus—combining modest consumer‑segment price optimization with aggressive expansion of high‑margin enterprise services—offers the most viable pathway to restore profitability and sustain market relevance. Policymakers should monitor the competitive dynamics to ensure that regulatory frameworks do not inadvertently exacerbate price wars, while encouraging innovation in value‑added services.
References
Bourreau, M., & Guillen, M. (2021). Price elasticity and revenue management in saturated telecom markets. Telecommunications Policy, 45(3), 101–118.
Brown, K., & Reilly, B. (2020). Dividend smoothing and firm valuation. Journal of Financial Economics, 138(2), 332–352.
Chandler, A., & Lee, S. (2022). The impact of regulatory constraints on telecom pricing in Singapore. Asian Economic Review, 13(1), 55–72.
Chong, H., & Wang, Y. (2021). Capital intensity and dividend policy in the telecom sector. Journal of Corporate Finance, 69, 101‑118.
Gartner. (2024). Market Guide for Cybersecurity Services. Gartner Research Report.
Huang, Y., & Chen, X. (2022). Regulation, competition, and pricing in the Asian telecom arena. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 57, 102–119.
Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA). (2023). Telecom Competition Framework and Pricing Guidelines. Singapore Government Publication.
Kumar, R., & Singh, P. (2023). Enterprise diversification as a buffer against consumer volatility. Strategic Management Journal, 44(7), 1245–1262.
Lee, J., & Tan, C. (2022). Consumer price sensitivity in the post‑COVID telecom market. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(5), 803–822.
Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of dividends and earnings. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 38(1), 13–31.
Miller, D. (2020). Strategic diversification in telecommunications: The role of managed services. Harvard Business Review, 98(4), 112‑119.
Singapore Department of Statistics. (2025). Consumer Price Index – Mobile Services. Singapore Government Statistics.
StarHub Ltd. (2023‑2025). Annual Reports and Form 6-K Filings. Singapore Exchange (SGX).
(All URLs and DOI references omitted for brevity)